Thoughts On The Artistic Process, Artist's Statements, Etc.

Click HERE for a blog post by photographer Paul Butzi, who, in the very first line of the post, writes, "I hate artist's statements." He proceeds to make a humorous argument against the concept of an artist's statement. He makes good arguments. And, although I could make some arguments about why artist's statements are helpful tools, I can't say that his argument is wrong, per se, or even flawed in any way. You may sympathize when you read what he has to say.

Below is a video in which painter Lucio Pozzi talks about an exhibit of what he calls "Mini Paintings". When you consider that most of his work is large enough to take up an entire gallery wall, calling these paintings "mini" seems like an extreme understatement. These paintings are a side-project he has done for decades that is a huge contrast from the rest of his work. Most of the video doesn't speak to any of the concerns brought up in class, but eventually he begins to talk about how when he works with these mini paintings, they act as a way for him to relax a bit, and that he insists on "not knowing what I'm doing" while he works on them. He has rules that remain consistent for all of these works, but after that he just goes for it, doing whatever feels natural without planning. He ends the video with a statement along the lines of, "It is a good feeling to spend some time working on these rather than getting up in the morning and saying, 'Ok, now I have to make another Lucio Pozzi.'" I think, perhaps, he may be speaking to similar frustrations to those voiced in class. In other words, what I think Pozzi is saying here is, "The work that I am known for is an exploration of concepts that I have to think about, question, and plan for. That is rewarding, but exhausting. It is nice to occassionally break away from that and work on something that is just as rewarding in the end, but requires far less planning and thinking." This is a decades-long established, successful, and historically important artist saying the same things that you, as students, are saying.

And now we have April Gornik. Yes, another painter. But, listen to her trying to put into words the things she thought about while making the work in the particular exhibition that she was displaying. She uses some flowery language, and it is easy sometimes to get lost in everything she is trying to communicate. I have shown this video to Art Appreciation classes, of which about 2/3 of the students have no art background at all. Often, the comments that I get afterward are along the lines of "Why did she talk so much about those paintings? I was enjoying just looking at the work. Then she started talking too much. The work didn't need all that explanation. It's all right there anyway. She made it all too technical. etc." See what you think...

Here's my point. The concerns you guys have in class are not new. They are as old as the establishment of "fine art" itself. The age-old question is: "Why can't it just be enough that the work is done?" I get it. These are valid concerns. So valid, that, as you can see above, well-established artists struggle to address them as well. In answer to your questions about why we are working in a method that seems to be chronologically backward from how you've worked previously, I present two considerations:

1. Thinking about what you want to say and planning exactly how you are going to say it BEFORE actually attempting to do the work gives you direction and puts you better in touch with yourself, your interests, and what it is that you want to tell the world. Let's put it in terms of professions other than art: Do you want the mechanic working on your car's engine to just dive in and start experimenting with everything without first spending a little time thinking about what the problem might possibly be and developing a plan? If a scientist wants to conduct an experiment, he has to first decide what question he wants to answer (how does gravity work? what is the atomic weight of hydrogen? is nicotine addictive? etc.). Then he has to develop a plan for an experiment that will get him results that will answer his specific question. We often like to place art on a pedestal separated from other professions because it is so uniquely (and humanly) expressive and has no right or wrong answers. But, art is not so unique of an endeavor that it shouldn't require at least a little early planning and legwork to be GOOD art.

2. The profession of art requires proposals and artist's statements, often times LONG before the work is finished. Even in fashion photography, wedding photography, or advertising, you will be asked by your client to give a full description of what you plan to do, how you plan to do it, and what you want the audience to experience when looking at your images. It is difficult to do that without having practiced. So, perhaps in whatever professional capacity you plan to use photography, your client may not expect you proceed with your work in exactly the same manner in which I am asking you to proceed. BUT, my hope is that, by getting some practice in defining, refining, and perfecting your conceptual approach NOW you will be all the more ready when your professional situation demands it.

WHEW! Ok, so, I hope this helps put some of your concerns to rest. Other than this, I can only say that this is how we're going to do things in this class. If you have disagreements with the process, then make your own decisions on how you will work when you leave this class. My job here and now is to get all three of you to think HARD about why you do what you do and to facilitate your discovery of methods of communicating your particular "why" to your audience.

Make sense?